Evolution of the same criminal act in Russian law is followed over long period of time from the first written regulation of arson in Russkaya Pravda, Sudna gramota of Pskov and both Sudebniks, to Saborno Ulozenije from 1649, that stands at the end of several centuries lasting process of reception of the Byzantine law in Moscow Russia. Research of the burning delict in Serbian law is focused on provisions of the Dusan’s Code, and in particularly on the issue of original and novel redaction of the article 99 of the Code. Inherited customary law provisions on one hand, and criminal law regulations taken from the Byzantine law into Russian and Serbian legislation on the other hand, can be distinguished when analysis of this particular criminal act of arson is performed. Yet, the powerful Doukas family opposed the new emperor, considering Romanos a usurper. Romanos was a member of the Anatolian military aristocracy, well aware of the dangers presented by Seljuk Turks. The article deals with the reception of the Byzantine law in medieval Serbian and Russian legislation on the example of arson as a criminal act. Having taken the purple in 1068, Romanos IV Diogenes focused on rebuilding the neglected military. Av.: + RWMANh - EVDKOIA, Christus zwischen. The empress too had no reasons to betray her husband and make her position even weaker without his presence in the palace. 35 The letter Diogenes addressed to his wife after his liberation reveals his implicit trust in her.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |